NBC Nightly News and The Daily Show

Last night, I watched news coverage from both The Daily Show and NBC Nightly News. Both programs had differed in several ways. In my last post, I recorded the stories that were presented on the NBC Nightly News. I found the program to be informative and straight-forward. What I also liked about the program was the presentation of a public interest story. The Daily Show differs from many major news networks due to the fact that it tries to present humor to the stories that they present.

The format of The Daily Show is definitely comedic. The design of the set is definitely poking fun at sets seen on many major news networks. Stewart begins his show by poking fun at the paranoia which surrounds the Swine Flu Virus. The program then reflects on Obama's 100 Days, and how major news networks like FOX, MSNBC, and CNN had covered the president's 100 days in office. The program definitely makes light of how theoretical physicist scientists desire to recreate "The Big Bang". In regards to entertainment, Stewart invites on Hugh Jackman to discuss his latest movie " X-Men Origins: Wolverine." Stewart raps up the episode by providing his viewers with the daily "Moment of Zen." The moment of Zen pokes fun in how pigs are seen as a "Petri Dish of Germs."

Overall, I felt that both programs were effective in the manner in which they presented news to their viewers. I definitely how the programs differed due to the fact that it was nice to see news presented in two different ways. I felt that The Daily Show provided more humor and light-hearted jokes as opposed to NBC Nightly News. The NBC Nightly News just provided the facts and was very frank. Although I enjoyed how the coverage that was presented on the NBC Nightly News, I wasn't dissatisfied with The Daily Show either. I enjoyed how The Daily Show was entertaining and informative at the same time. Therefore, I felt that both programs were effective and informative.

May The Force Be With You,
Lauren

Brian Williams and NBC Nightly News

At 6:30, NBC News Anchor Brian Williams provides his viewers with top stories that are effecting the nation. Today, Williams brought light to news events which appeared in this order:

1. Job Opening-Justice David Souter's Retirement

2.Swine Flu Outbreak

3. Wall Street- Up 44 Points

4.Diet Danger-Hydroxycut Health Risks

5.Sky Walking-Sears Tower Newest Tourist Attraction

6.Las Vegas Entertainer Danny Gans' Death

7.Chrysler's Financial Trouble-Down 48 Percent

8.Kentucky Derby

9. Making A Difference Report (Public Interest Story)

Williams reports on Supreme Court Justice David Souter's retirement. The coverage reflects on how President Obama has a big decision to make in regards to appointing a new justice. Next, the coverage focused on the latest news regarding the Swine Flu Outbreak. According to the report, there are about 200 reported cases of the virus in the United States. 23 states have been exposed to this outbreak. Then, the report took us to Wall Street where the Dow has been up 44 points.

In regards to health, Williams provides his viewers with the recent health risks imposed by Hydroxycut. The FDA has stated that Hydroxycut imposes potential liver damage, thus leading the product to be recalled. In Chicago, The Sears Tower released a new tourist attraction called "The Sears Tower Skydeck" where tourists can get the sense of walking on air. In a entertainment related story, Danny Gans, a Las Vegas entertainer had passed away at the age of 52. In financial news, the report reflects on Chrysler's most recent financial troubles. Williams concludes his report by providing coverage on The Kentucky Derby and A Public Interest Story which tells the story of a Los Angeles woman whom helps individuals learn to cook and run a small cooking business.

In conclusion, I felt that the coverage provided by the NBC Nightly News had been more effective than the coverage presented at 5:00 on ABC. I felt that the order in which these stories had appeared was genuine and efficient. What I liked about the coverage was the presentation of a public interest story which is rarely shown on television. It is nice to hear stories about individuals whom are trying to make a difference by help others. If I were asked in how to improve the coverage, I would suggest more international related stories. I feel that by presenting international stories, the general public can get more of an insight to what is happening around the world. Overall, the coverage was brief, effective, and efficient.

May The Force Be With You,

Lauren

The Hype Regarding Michelle Obama's Sneakers

Let's face it. As you turn on your computer or television, you are bombarded with images of Michelle Obama. Whether it's about her clothing or the secret to her "toned" arms, the media is absolutely head over heels in love with this woman. In fact the New York Daily News gives their readers the most recent story regarding Michelle's $540 dollar shoes. Wait! Are my eyes deceiving me? $540 dollars shoes? Are you serious? I smell hypocrisy in action!

How is this hypocritical? Well, let's go back to the 2008 campaign trail of John McCain. John McCain's wife, Cindy McCain had faced constant scrutiny on her choice of wardrobe. In fact in a 2008 article published by The Los Angeles Times, the article "Who Get's Your Style Vote" implies that Cindy McCain is a high-fashioned, Oscar de la Renta wearing snob while Michelle is portrayed to be this Target wearing, down-to-earth, and dignified woman.

Let's fast forward a few years. Recently, Michelle has been spotted wearing French designer Lanvin sneakers that roughly cost $540 dollars. The article obviously puts the First Lady in a favorable light by stating that "Michelle takes casual to a haute new level." Basically, the article implies that it was okay for Obama to wear expensive sneakers and tops which range from $400 to $1000 due to the fact that she was planting trees and performing an act of community service. Yes, I would agree that clothing like Oscar de la Renta does not represent the the general majority of Americans as well, but neither does sneakers that cost $540 dollars. This is indeed hypocritical.

If Cindy McCain is going to be criticized for her choice of clothing, Michelle Obama should be too. The media has obviously been more favorable to Obama, and I find it unfair. Well, Sean Hannity is definitely not liking the favorable stories surrounding Obama's choice of clothing either. In fact, in The Huffington Post, Hannity expresses his anger by stating that Michelle "can get all these designer clothes and that everyone will call her Jackie Kennedy." What I'm trying to convey is that Michelle Obama should be subjected to the equal criticism of Cindy McCain. Neither woman is better or more "down-to-earth" than the other. What I'm asking for is equal criticism, not biased.

May The Force Be With You,

Lauren

Anne Coulter and the CIA Memo Debate

On yesterday's episode of Hannity, Sean Hannity had invited on columnist Anne Coulter to discuss the debate which involves the recently released CIA interrogation memos. Hannity begins his show by imposing the question: Will President Obama prosecute the CIA Officials whom took part in waterboarding? He provides his viewers with a "What We Know" list regarding Obama's stance on the issue. According to the report, Obama first resisted the idea of prosecuting the CIA officials involved. Obama had been quoted as far as saying that he wanted the United States to move forward from this issue.

Then in a matter of time, Obama had recently stated that "the decision to prosecute the CIA officials shall be up to the attorney general."Reflecting on Obama's recent change of decision, Hannity invites Anne Coulter to give her opinion about this issue. He begins his interview by asking Coulter if Obama had been swayed in any way to change his mind regarding the prosecution of these officials. Coulter responds by stating that Obama had been influenced by the media. The columnist claims that the media has "been screaming torture" and that they have not provided any substantial information from these memos. In regards to the memos, Coulter feels that the interrogation methods used by these officials are "wussy methods" and should not be mistaken with torture.

For example, Coulter provides viewers with information regarding some of the interrogation methods used by these CIA officials. She states that the officials used a caterpillar in one of their interrogations due to the fact that Abu Zubaydah was afraid of caterpillars. Due to interrogations methods like these, Coulter feels that "we are being laughed at throughout the Arab world. I mean, if they are actually reading these memos, they cannot be very afraid of being captured, because it is such wussie stuff that's going on..." Both Coulter and Hannity feel that it would be a damaging mistake if the press had released the names of the CIA officials involved in this issue. Hannity and Coulter conclude their interview by reviewing Obama and his 100 days as president. Both Hannity and Coulter feel that the general public has not seen the effects of Obama's policies and that his "changes are bankrupting the country."


Being against torture, I don't necessarily agree with Coulter's comments regarding the debate surrounding the CIA memos. Waterboarding is not "wussie stuff" and should not be practiced at all. Even with Coulter's caterpillar argument, I feel that the way these officials had used a caterpillars to "evoke fear and discomfort"from Zubaydah is wrong. Like Ali Soufan said "there is a way to talk without using torture." I would agree with Soufan's arguement that the CIA should use traditional interrgational methods which do not involve torture. However, I can understand both Coulter and Hannity's frustration in how Obama had suddenly changed his stance regarding the prosecution of these officials. Coulter is entitled to her opinion, and this is still a very debated issue. I feel that it is beneficial to hear all sides of an arguement.

May The Force Be With You,
Lauren

Painter Named The Next U.N. Good Will Ambassador

Let's face it. Now a days when you hear that the United Nations is appointing new ambassadors, your mind probably jumps to the names of celebrities like George Clooney and Charlize Theron. But yesterday, the United Nations had surprised us all by appointing a painter as it's newest Good Will Ambassador. As an avid fan of the arts, I was surprised to stumble across this article in the Arts section of the New York Times. Robert Bleckner, an abstract painter, has been recognized by the United Nations for his involvement in projects which strive to battle AIDS and human trafficking. Bleckner's most recent art project which specifically featured the artwork of many children from Uganda, has earned him much praise and recognition.

In the beginning of this year, Bleckner had traveled to Gulu, Uganda, an area which struggles with the terrorist actions imposed by the Lord's Resistance Army. Many children of Gulu are often forced to partake in combat or to become sexual objects. Using paint, paint brushes, and paper which roughly cost 1,000 dollars, Bleckner had worked with a group of these children in hopes to create art which shall be sold at a United Nations Benefit. These paintings are on display at the clothing store "Moschino" in New York City. At this same United Nations benefit, Bleckner shall be appointed as the new Good Will Ambassador.

Simone Monasebian, New York's chief of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime feels that art helps children whom have experienced such a traumatic experience, cope with themselves as individuals and help them alleviate the suffering and pain that they have endured. She states that art is an effective medium due to the fact "it really needs no translation...it's immediately accessible to anyone who sees it." It is sad to say, but human, drug, and arms trafficking is still in existence, thus being roughly worth 32 billion dollars a year.

I found this article to be very impressive and informative. I admire Bleckner for his efforts in teaching these children art skills that they can use to express themselves. Bleckner even hopes that he can "give someone (children) the tools to create something that they can be proud of, and which can help them on the arduous path to restoring their dignity and sense of self-worth." I commend The United Nations in their choice, and hope to hear more news regarding Bleckner's work as a Good Will ambassador. Bleckner plans to return to Uganda in hopes to create a "bigger art project" which shall involve more children.

For a slide show of the children's artwork from Uganda, click it and visit here!

May The Force Be With You,

Lauren

Global 3000

Global 3000, a magazine based television program broad-casted by the German broadcasting network Deutsche Welle strives to present their viewers with a weekly look on how globalization is effecting individuals around the world. The program deals with diverse topics such as biodiversity, drug trade, food shortages, and other issues that effect the globe.

Today, Global 3000 discusses the international drug trade (full program clip provided through link). In the clip provided above, Global 3000 presents their viewers with information regarding the concerning issue of global drug trade. The report takes us to Peru where many cocoa farmers are struggling with this crisis everyday. Cocoa, an essential crop in Peru is often grown for ritual purposes and as a natural stimulant for many. According to the report, 90 percent of the cocoa harvest goes to the illegal trade of cocaine. Unfortunately, cocoa farmers are caught in this "crossfire". Many farmers are caught partaking in this illegal trade of cocoa leaves due to the fact they need the money for survival. Black market drug dealers will buy cocoa leaves even if they aren't the best of quality. Therefore, farmers feel that it is an easy way for them to make money.

The life of a cocoa farmer isn't easy. In fact, the money that these farmers often earn isn't enough for them to live off, therefore leading many of them to poverty. Unfortunately, many farmers feel that this is the only work that they know, thus leaving them with few alternatives. The United Nations are trying to help farmers deal with this struggle by encouraging cocoa farmers to switch to the selling of other crops, but unfortunately this is a battle that will take some time to win. Programs like Global 3000 help us viewers recognize that problems like these do exist in the world.

What I like most about Global 3000 is that they provide their viewers with a broad range of topics from an international perspective. I also enjoy how they present material from all around the world, as opposed to material from solely one place. I feel that many programs here in the United States don't provide stories that deal with global issues. Programs like Global 3000 help us viewers recognize that these problems do exist. Globalization is all around us, and we deserve to be informed and educated on ways to improve global situations. Therefore, I find programs like Global 3000 to be the most informative and effective.

For more information about Global 3000, click it and visit it here!

May The Force Be With You,
Lauren

NPR: National Public Radio

The National Public Radio (NPR) strives to allocate recent news to it's viewers. A private and non-profit organization, NPR provides non-commercial news coverage, talk-show programs, and entertainment based programs to many listeners each week. NPR has gained international success and receives 27.5 million viewers each week. Listeners can listen to NPR through radio programing as well as on-line programming. Online, NPR provides their listeners with radio, pod-casts, community, and mobile services. I found NPR'S online-website to be very informative and effective for their listeners.

Today (April 29), NPR had broadcasted a variety of stories. The major breaking story provided on the network had regarded The Swine Flu Virus story. According to the broadcast, The World Health Organization (WHO) had moved the Pandemic Flu Level to a five today. On this scale, a five represents that the virus will soon turn into a widespread pandemic. The virus has now effected a dozen of countries. In the US, 94 cases have been detected. The symptoms are mild to moderate, thus making it hard to detect the virus. In the United States, one child has died due to the virus. The network recommends that people constantly wash their hands and avoid those who are sick.

The program continued on to report on the United States economic system. Although the system is weak, household spending has begun to "stabilize." In New Hampshire, same sex marriage has become legalized. The network raps up their report by providing their listeners with information regarding the release of several detainees in Gautama Bay and the recent death of four soldiers in Baghdad. In conclusion, the report provided much more information about The Swine Virus than the other stories that they provided.

Many networks like NPR are strictly providing more information regarding the virus. Since this is a recent and world-wide story, the coverage of The Swine Flu Virus will continue on for some time. Though it is important to cover the story, it is now being covered every hour. Even after listening to the NPR and other news programs, I feel that I really don't know anything about the symptoms and effects of The Swine Flu Virus. But since the virus is at an early stage, I will just have to keep my eyes and ears open for more information regarding the virus.

May The Force Be With You,

Lauren

The War on Iraq: A Video Game?

You might be asking yourself, is this a nightmare? How could such a catastrophic event be turned into a video game? Well ladies and gentleman, this controversial video game had plans to make it's debut in 2010, until war veterans' complaints had pulled "the plug" on this recent game. The New Zealand Herald reports that Konami Digital Entertainment had decided no longer to back or produce the game due to the negative feedback that they had received from many war veteran groups. Many critics of the game feel that video games like these have gone too far in presenting haunting material to their gamers.

Six Days in Fallujah has made headlines due to it's explicit and controversial material. In the press release of the game (clip above), President Peter Tamte of Atomic Games states that Six Days in Fallujah wanted to retell the story of the marines so that gamers can gain an insight to what soldiers and marine had experienced in the Battle of Fallujah. They wanted their gamers to crawl under the skin of these soldiers to inform the public on such a historic battle. What you can actually do in the video game? According to the press release, gamers can "blow a hole through any wall and can destroy any building."Tamte states that the main tactics of the game are to "degrade and destroy any part of the game world". And this such an "accurate" representation of such a historic battle? I think not.

Many war veterans feel that this game was too inappropriate for gamers. Gold Star Families Speak Out, an organization for families whose loved ones died in Iraq and Afghanistan state that " Gold Star families continue to live with the horrors of war every day as we mourn the loss of our loved ones. We question how anyone can trivialize a war that continues to kill and main members of the military and Iraqi civilians to this day. The war is not a game and neither was the Battle of Fallujah. For Konami and Atomic Games to minimize the reality of an ongoing war and at the same time profit off the deaths of people close to us by making it 'entertaining' is despicable."

Video games have gone too far in the material that they are presenting to their gamers. Sure one could say that many video games are fantasy based, but games like Six Days in Fallujah aren't. The are based off of real events. And what does this say to young viewers? That life has a reset button, and you can start all over again? Well, the United States soldiers and Iraq civilians didn't get that chance and video games like these aren't portraying them in an accurate or positive light. I am pleased that Konami has finally decided to pull the game due to the negative feedback in which they have received. Unfortunately, games like these are not new and many are still being produced. However, parents and individuals should re-examine what material is being put out there and to decide whether or not they want to sponsor or purchase games like these.

May The Force Be With You,

Lauren

Robot Chicken's Political Satire

Being a huge fan of both Star Wars and Robot Chicken, I decided to post a clip from The Robot Chicken Star Wars' Special entitled "Jedi Master George W." This clip thrives on pure satire and pokes fun at former President Bush's presidential term. Robot Chicken, a late-night comedic animated show featured on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim thrives on presenting satirical and comedic skits to their audiences. Often mocking pop culture, an episode of Robot Chicken runs for about twenty to thirty minutes. In this clip, George Bush becomes a powerful Jedi Master and uses a light saber and the infamous Jedi-Mind Trick against so called enemies like Abraham Lincoln and Bill Clinton. He even uses mind control against his own wife. Although this clip is hysterical, should such material be allowed to be displayed on television?

The answer is yes. Satire is protected speech thus guaranteed in the United States Constitution. This is evident in the case of Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. Jerry Fawell, a southern pastor sued Hustler Magazine for a fake ad that had been issued about him. Hustler Magazine had ran a fake ad of a drunk Jerry Falwell having sex with his mother in an outhouse. Falwell sued Larry Flynt and Hustler Magazine for libel and for intentionally causing distress. Although the case was appealed to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court had ruled that satire was a protected speech and is protected by the First Amendment.

Overall, programs like Robot Chicken are allowed to air parodies due to the fact that they are protected by the First Amendment. Even at the beginning of every episode, Robot Chicken even states that "Any actual names or likeness of celebrities are used in a fictitious and parodic manner." Therefore it is safe to say that Robot Chicken is indeed allowed to produce it's material due the fact that are presenting comedy in a fictitious and parodic manner. If you haven't seen any episode of Robot Chicken, I strongly recommend you to check it out! It's worth watching!

May the Force Be With You,

Lauren

WANTED: Parental Supervision

While reading Kayla's post regarding the Girls Next Door, I feel that Kayla makes an excellent point regarding the necessity of parental supervision. Yes, shows like The Girls Next Door and Rock of Love do provide some explicit material, but they aren't going to disappear anytime soon. Sure, it would be easy to be able to trust the rating systems that are often found on the top corner of your television screen, but the reality is that sometimes these rating systems aren't that trustworthy.

As you flip throughout channels, sex and violence have become more common to see throughout many programs. On MTV, every other word on a majority of their programs has been “bleeped.” Society has become more liberal towards what is shown and spoken on television. Words like sex were not common words spoken on family comedies in the 1950’s. Network Censors had a stronger restriction to what could have been said on television. In fact, The Brady Bunch only used the word “sex” until the last episode. On the “I Love Lucy” show, Lucy and Ricky were forbidden to sleep in the same bed. So instead, the characters had slept in twin beds. Censors did not want to promote sexuality to viewers.

Shows like The Girls Next Door are allowed to display such content with protection from the United State’s Constitution. Due to the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The media does indeed have a right to produce and display what they would like, but parents should take more of of a responsible stand to monitoring what their children are actually watching on television.

Viewers do have the choice to watch what they please, but what is needed amongst many families is more parental supervision. By our constitution, the entertainment industry is guaranteed to produce what they please and will continue to do so. Parents should become more proactive and take a responsive stand to what their children are watching. Violence and sexual content is everywhere and our children must be protected. But the protection they require doesn’t happen overnight. If parents do not look after their children, who will?

May The Force Be With You,
Lauren

Ali Soufan's Tortued Decision

In The New York Times Opinion section, Op-Ed contributor Ali Soufan comments on the recent issue involving the C.I.A. and the controversial aspect of waterboarding. Soufan, a former F.B.I. Supervisory Special Agent provides his readers with his point of view, that being a former investigator whom earned the title as a "Top Expert on Al Qaeda." Having been "silent" for some time, Soufan finally opens up about the C.I.A.'s interregational methods, and voices his opinion regarding the issue of waterboarding. Coming from a position of non-violence, Soufan publicly states that there is a way to talk to terrorists without using interrogational methods such waterboarding or flat out torture. In light of the recently released memos regarding the C.I.A.'S interrogational methods, Soufan states that there are "lessons to be learned."

Soufan opens his argument by directly quoting or referencing to the recently released memos. He argues that these memos are "falsely based" and goes on the assumption that ruthless interrogation methods like waterboarding are imperative to use due to the fact that terrorists like Abu Zubaydah were "uncooperative." Having once dealt with Zubaydah himself, Soufan feels that it is incorrect to say that Zubaydah was uncooperative. Having used "traditional interrogation methods" (those that do not involve torture), Soufan states that he was effective in gaining crucial information from Zubadyah.

Soufan supports his claim by providing substantial information which works to his advantage. For example, Soufan affirms that he was able to learn that Khalid Shaikn Mohammed was organizer of the September 11 Attacks and Jose Padilla's involvement as the "dirty bomber." Soufan thus feels that traditional interrogation techniques are the most effective in seeking crucial information and efficient in saving lives as well. Soufan continues on to state that the information provided by the C.I.A. is false and does not add up. He states that the "defenders or justifiers of torture" argue that they were able to extract crucial information from Zubaydah thus leading to the capture of Ramzi bin al-Shibh. Soufan's rebutal is that these claims are false and Ramzi bin al-Shibh's capture should be credited to the terrorist operative group who used traditional interrogational methods as opposed to those which involve torture.

Overall, Soufan believes that it was the right for the C.I.A. memos to be released. He feels that the issues surrounding the memos should not be a "partisan matter." The contributor states that it is crucial for the United States to move on and learn from these recent mistakes. Soufan argues that the C.I.A. is a necessary agency which strives to insure the safety of the American public. Soufan concludes his argument in hopes that the United States will regain it's title as the"World's Foremost Defenders of Human Rights." Soufan affirms that "We must ensure that the mistakes behind the use of these techniques are never repeated. We’re making a good start: President Obama has limited interrogation techniques to the guidelines set in the Army Field Manual, and Leon Panetta, the C.I.A. director, says he has banned the use of contractors and secret overseas prisons for terrorism suspects (the so-called black sites).

In response, I feel that Soufan's arguement is legitimate and very effective. Like Soufan, I would agree that traditional interrogational methods are most effective as opposed to methods which involve torture. It is crucial for this country to move forward from a dark period of history. I would agree with Soufan in the fact our country should learn from this mistake and work towards using interrogational methods which do not involve torture. Overall, I enjoyed reading Ali Soufan's Tortured Decision.

May The Force Be With You!
Lauren

The Swine Flu Virus

Yesterday, Both Fox News and CNN have been providing continuous coverage on the recent epidemic: The Swine Virus. The Swine Flu Virus, a virus which has now become a global epidemic, has effected countries such as Mexico, United States, and France. Both CNN and Fox News provide their viewers with similar coverage such as what viewers can do to stay healthy, guidance from professionals, and key facts that involve the virus itself. As we discussed in class, during crises, news channels provide extensive and informative coverage on crises.
After watching both Fox News and CNN, I had visited their websites to find more similarities on their coverage of the The Swine Virus.

On both CNN and Fox News, reporters provide their readers with the latest news and coverage regarding the virus. On the front page of the networks' websites, The Swine Virus is the main breaking story. Both CNN and Fox News provide their readers with a Q/A page regarding the virus. Both networks had interviewed the same medical experts for advice and how viewers can stay protected from the virus. They continue their coverage by providing their readers and viewers with detailed information on recent cases that have been identified in the United States, Mexico, and Europe. They also provide their viewers with the latest school closings in the United States.

Overall, I feel that when the United States is faced with an epidemic or severe crisis, both CNN and Fox News tend to provide their readers with similar coverage. In my opinion, I prefer objective coverage over partisan coverage. I feel that if an individual watches solely Fox News or CNN, they will formulate biased opinions based on the partisan information that they are seeking. When watching new programs, I like to flip the channel to seek information from different networks to gain information from different points of view. In conclusion, I feel that during crises like The Swine Virus Epidemic, networks tend to provide similar coverage to their viewers.

For more information concerning The Swine Virus, visit CNN and Fox News for continuous coverage concerning this rising epidemic.

May the force be with you,
Lauren

"The Morning After Pill" Now For 17-Year Olds

On the front page of the New York Times, Gardiner Harris, a reporter for The Times reports on the recent change made by The Food and Drug Administration regarding "The Morning-After Pill." According to the article, women or men whom are of seventeen years of age or older will now be able to purchase the morning-after pill without a doctor's prescription. This recent change made by The Food and Drug Administration over-turns the previous decision regarding the pill made by The Bush Administration. Those who purchase the pill must show a proof of age such as a driver's license or school identification to obtain this contraceptive. While some praise this new change, others feel that this change will promote teenagers to have more unprotected sex.

Controversy has always surrounded "Plan B." While contraceptive advocates feel that the morning-after pill will lower the amount of unplanned pregnancies and abortions amongst teenagers, anti-abortion advocates feel that Plan B is equivalent to an abortion. In fact, Harris states that the debate over Plan-B has become more a political issue as opposed to a health or safety issue. The change was made due to a court case which argued that the Bush Administration had tried to put a holdup on access to the morning-after pill due to their political and ideological beliefs. Judge Edward R. Korman of the Federal District Court of New York ruled that the Food and Drug Administration shall make the contraceptive accessible to girls whom are seventeen. Many organizations such as The World Health Organization argue that restrictions like age should be dropped completely. Many other world organizations have already made the morning-pill contraceptive available to young adults regardless of their age.

Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights commends the notable change and states “It’s time the F.D.A. restores confidence in its ability to safeguard the public health and put medical science first.” Contraceptive Activists like Northup feel that the morning-after-pill should be accessible to young girls due to the fact that it "if a woman waits to long after unprotected sex, the more likely she will become pregnant." They feel that Plan B shall reduce the amount of abortions and young teenage pregnancies. On the other hand, anti-abortion advocates argue that contraceptives like Plan B will increase the amount of abortions and teens engaging in unprotected sex.

This question still remains: Should age restrictions be removed permanently, thus allowing children as young as 10 to take Plan B without any medical supervision? Personally, I am on the fence about this issue. I feel that young women should be allowed to obtain Plan B, but I don't know if children as young as the age of ten should be allowed to take this contraceptive without consulting a doctor. Although the drug does not have any long-term effects, I wouldn't advise a young girl at such a young age to take this pill on her own without consulting a doctor first.

May the force be with you,

Lauren

Edward R. Murrow: Champion of Journalism

The 2005 film Good Night and Good Luck, focuses on the constant struggle between famed journalist Edward R. Murrow and the rise of Communist investigations imposed by the famed Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy. Murrow, host of the CBS show See It Now and his staff at the CBS News Room strived to expose or question McCarthy's constant interrogations of individuals whom were deemed as "Communists." The film focuses on the case regarding Milo Radulovich, a lieutenant of the U.S. Air Force who was accused of having Communist ties and thus was forced to discharge from the reserve.

Murrow and his team were quick to defend Radulovich and stated that McCarthy's approach was unethical and unjust. They felt that McCarthy's evidence and claim was unsubstantial and weak. Murrow states that "“No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.”After publicly exposing Radulovich's case on See It Now, Murrow and his staff were effective in the fact that Radulovich was "reinstated" back to the reserve, thus creating a significant impact.

In a democracy, it is believed that the media often serves as a "watchdog" to check facts and to provide accurate information to the general public. Murrow took the job of being a watch-dog seriously. He felt that the media has a responsibility and it should not always assume that the government is not prone in making mistakes or that it always "responsible." What is most admirable about Murrow and his news team was that despite the controversy surrounding the stories that had decided to broadcast, they were willing to take a risk and take a stand against a public figure. Although Murrow and his staff received heat and criticism about publicly taking a stand against McCarthy on See It Now, Murrow strived to educate his viewers on important events like McCarthyism which took place during the time period. He felt that it was his duty as a journalist to inform the public on current events. He felt that providing honest, accurate, and truthful facts to the general public was imperative and his chief duty as a journalist. Murrow states "To be persuasive we must be believable; to be believable we must be credible; credible we must be truthful.”

Like Murrow, I feel that it is crucial for the media to keep a "critical eye" on government officials to make sure that these same officials whom are in positions of power are doing their jobs effectively. Like Murrow once said: "We cannot make good news out of bad practice." Civilians too have the duty to be able to question and check on public leaders. George Clooney, director of the film states that “The script for this film was written 52 years ago by Edward R. Murrow, who taught us many valuable lessons about responsibility and always, always questioned authority, because without it authority often goes unchecked.” In conclusion, I feel that it safe to say that Edward R. Murrow does indeed deserve the title of educator, mentor, and champion of journalism.


Good Night and Good Luck,
Lauren

CUT: The Movie: Time to Call Cut!

In continuation with Domestic Violence Awareness Month, I decided to post Women's Aid's most recent advertisement CUT: The Movie which concerns the life of a woman who is struggling in an abusive relationship. Women's Aid, a charity organization which strives to put a stop to domestic violence, provides women whom are in abusive relationships with help and guidance to get out of a hostile and endangering situation. The English charity also provides networks in which women can converse with one another and find ways to end the battle against sexual assault. CUT: The Movie is Women's Aid most recent campaign in promoting the issue of Domestic Violence. The film or advertisement stars Kiera Knightley, a well known actress whom agrees that domestic violence is a crime that is rarely spoken about. In regards to the film, Knightley states "I wanted to take part in this advert for Women's Aid because while domestic violence exists in every section of society, we rarely hear about it. We may not think we know someone who has experienced domestic violence, but this does not mean that it is not happening."

The film focuses on the life of a young woman whom appears to be an actress. A she returns home from a long day on the set, she arrives to find her boyfriend eerily waiting for her to return to their apartment. As she opens the front door, she finds the mirror to be shattered (due to her boyfriend's fit of rage), and blood to be scattered all over the table. She notices and this and kindly offers the man a towel for his "wound". Shortly after, her boyfriend questions what the young woman has done throughout the day. His begins to raise his voice and quite suddenly slaps the woman across the face with the towel that she had given him out of kindness. Immediately, the young woman states "that this was not in the script." But sooner or later, the woman is thus grabbed by the hair, called a whore, and kicked repeatedly to ground until the screen zooms out of what appears to be an empty set. Their is no director or crew are in sight. The only characters involved in the final scene are the man, Knightley's character, and the audience whom is supposedly viewing the scene. All you can hear are the shrieks and repeated cries of "I did not ask for this." from the woman whom is being repeatedly kicked. At the clip's ending, a question is imposed towards the audience by stating "Isn't time that someone called cut?"

I believe that it is important for online websites like YouTube to present advertisement campaigns like CUT: The Movie. Advertisements like this shall inform the general public of how real the issue of domestic violence really is. Although, many have argued that this clip is too graphic, I find that this clip shouldn't have been softened up or tamed in any other way. The violence should not be glamorized or covered up. Domestic violence is a real issue that many women deal with everyday. In fact, according the advertisement, 2 women die from domestic violence every week. CUT: The Movie provides truth to what often occurs in many abusive relationships. The violence is real, even off the screen. I feel that CUT:The Movie is an effective advertisement, thus it shall gain the attention of many viewers. This advertisement could serve as "wake up call" to many women and help them seek the help and guidance they need to get out of an abusive relationship. Knightley praises Women's Aid by stating " Without the services provided by Women's Aid, many more women could be at risk of being killed, yet without donations the charity may not exist this time next year. Please donate £2 a month to Women's Aid to help save lives." Wouldn't you agree that isn't it time that we strive to put an end to domestic violence

According to Women's Aid website, the film or advertisement can be viewed in local cinemas or on online websites like YouTube.

To make a donation or for more information about the film, visit CUT:The Movie on Women's Aid website!

May the force be with you!

Lauren

Rock of Love Bus: Double Dates or Ways to Hate?!

Rock of Love starring Bret Michaels has had a run for about two seasons now. The show's star Bret Michaels, former lead singer of the band Poison, is looking for love for about the third time. This season entitled Rock of Love Bus with Bret Michaels continues on Michael's quest to finally find love, but with a totally new "feel". Compared to the last two seasons of the show, this season has it's female contestants living with each other and Bret Michaels on two tour buses to "recreate a rocker-type" atmosphere. The girls are thus competing with one another for Bret's love by partaking in "challenges" that are specifically geared around Bret and his "rock-lifestyle on the road." These challenges then shall help Michaels decide which girl is most "appropriate" for his life on and off the road. Each episode, the girls are given "passes" if they succeed or fit Bret's criteria.

In this episode entitled "Double Dates", the final three contestants Mindy, Jamie, and Taya are flown to Florida to meet Bret and to go on dates with him. When the girls arrive, Mardi Gras costumes are laid out on their beds by none other than Bret. Not only are the costumes risky, but both Jamie and Taya are willing to wear something that basically exposes a majority of their body! Jamie is even caught saying "It's cheesy, it's beady, i love it" without any hesitation. You can even hear Taya in the background exclaiming "I'm going to show everything I got, It's what Bret wants!" It just floors me how these two women, are willing to stoop this low and do whatever Bret wants. But hey, in the end, isn't that what they are competing for, right? The only girl who does not feel comfortable wearing the costume is Mindy. She is even states " I would never put this on to impress someone. I'm not going to be something that I'm not." Immediately, the other girls attack Mindy and state that she has a "bad attitude". Clearly if she is not comfortable wearing the costume, then she shouldn't have to. Is this really an attitude problem?

And what is Bret's response? Right off the bat, Bret proclaims "She ain't having the time of her life in her outfit. That girl has to learn how to roll with the punches on the road." He then flat out tells her with no hesitation to "put a damn bikini on for god's sake." Michaels, how are you going to have the time of your life if you are in an outfit that exposes half of your body? Sure, Mindy does have the right not to wear the outfit, but you just have to keep reminding yourself that these girls are asking for trouble if they go on the air to try and win the heart of scum bag Bret Michaels.

Mindy then get's rid of the whole I shouldn't have to wear this triade to only come out and wear a bikini and short shorts that reveal way too much. And to think for a split second that I thought this girl a had a legitimate arguement? Then again, I should have known better. Bret comments on Mindy's lack of clothing and happily laments "Much better." It's Bret Michaels what else do you expect? In conclusion, I feel that when you watch Rock of Love Bus with Bret Michaels you have to know what your getting yourself into. This kind of television is not geared to stimulate any form of thought, therefore I don't feel as if the show has a negative effect on female viewers. Sure, as a woman I am bothered how these women are willing to sucumb and do anything for Bret Michaels, but in the end it's a competition, and they were willing to take part from day one! People need to realize that this type of television should not be taken seriously. It is entertainment, and it is only function is to entertain.

In the end you have the choice to watch shows like Rock of Love Bus with Bret Michaels. That is why the remote was invented. I choose not to watch crap like this, so therefore I don't watch. If people find this entertaining, to each his own. You have a choice to tune, but if your like me, you don't have to watch at all!

May the force be with you!

Lauren

It's 5:00 on WABC-TV

As the clock strikes 5:00, the familiar faces of both Sade Baderinwa and Diana Williams appear on screen. Featured on channel 7, WABC-TV strives to provide news coverage within the New York Area and to present coverage on national and worldly issues. The news program began it's coverage by reporting the devastating earthquake which had occurred in Italy. According to the news coverage, more than 150 people were found dead in it's aftermath. Continuing on, the program discussed many local stories including the death of a New York City police-officer, and the brutal beating of a teenage girl in the Brooklyn area. Overall, a majority of the stories presented last evening consisted of either lifestyle or entertainment stories.

Obviously stories concerning lifestyle often appeal to the general public. WABC-TV has definitely picked up on that notion. Last night, lifestyle stories included ways to detect Restless Leg Syndrome and how many drivers shall benefit from the recession. Of course the forecast of the weekly weather is important, but is it really necessary to broadcast stories in how drivers can benefit from the recession? Immediately after, WABC-TV went into Entertainment stories in how Farah Fawcett is struggling with liver cancer and the latest coverage of the Criss Brown trial. Sure these stories can be appealing to some, but are they really that benefitial to the general public?

Sure, you could probably pick up some facts regarding Restless Leg Syndrome, but it is really necessary to report on how Criss Brown returned to court that same day? Overall, it is evident that there was more of an emphasis on stories regarding entertainment and lifestyle as opposed to stories with political content. In fact, there were hardly any political stories focused on at all. After watching, I felt that the only story which had some political content was how former president Bill Clinton had given praise to Mayor Michael Bloomberg for his environmental campaign for New York City. Overall, I was dissatisfied with the news coverage presented on WABC-TV. Although the anchors did an effective job in reporting the news coverage, I felt that a majority of the stories had been geared around entertainment or lifestyle.

May the force be with you!

Lauren

A Gift Fit For A Queen: An I-Pod?

The Huffington Post's Arianna Huffington strives to provide her readers with current news and information from a liberal point of view. Recently, Huffington reports on President Obama's recent visit to England. While attending a scheduled meeting with the Queen of England at Buckingham Palace, President Obama presented the Queen with a unique gift: an I-Pod. You might be asking yourself, why would the President present the Queen with such a peculiar gift? Well according to the article, the gift did have a significant purpose.

Huffington states that President Obama presented the Queen of England with an I-Pod containing a video recording of the Queen's most recent visit to the United States. In return, the Queen presented the Obamas with a "picture of both her and her husband." Not only did President Obama present the Queen with a gift. The Obamas had also given Gordon Brown and his family with "DVDs (in the incorrect format) and Marine models." The British public had recieved the gift giving positively.

While visiting The Huffington Post, I found the layout of Huffington's blog to be quite effective. Huffington's usage of images had been effective in presenting her readers with a visual which helps to aid readers when reading any given information. For this article in particular, I found it effective how Huffington had added a slide show of pictures concerning the Obama's visit with the Queen of England. It was effective and served her purpose quite well. Overall, I found the quality of Huffington's post to neat, organized, and effective.

To view a slideshow of the Obama's current visit with the Queen of England: Visit The Huffington Post and check it out! You might also want to comment or check out what other's are saying in response to the article! Some of the comments are great!!

May The Force Be With You,

Lauren

April Is Sexual Awareness Month!

Today, I decided to visit Feministing, a prominent Feminist blog which strives to inform young women in the 21st century on current issues that affect the future of women. April, the current month, is geared on informing the public on ways to combat and to recognize sexual violence. Ariela Migdal, Staff Attorney of the ACLU'S Women's Right strives to inform her readers about what many colleges around the United States are doing in order to recognize Sexual Assault Awareness Month.

On many college campuses, many students are striving to advocate Title IX, a civil rights law which forbids sexual inequity in "federally funded education programs." Recently, The Supreme Court decreed that sexual assault victims have the right to issue "Title IX claims" against institutions if the school had knowledge about the assault, but failed to react to the act of violence. The use of Title IX was recently seen in a sexual assault case which took place at Arizona State University.

In 2009, a young women had been raped on campus, and brought the issue forth to the University's attention. The man, whom was well-known for his athletic performance on campus, had been "expelled" from the university, but only for some time. In a matter months, the young man had been allowed to return to ASU, without any punishment. In response, the young woman had issued a Title IX complaint against the university. The university was then forced to pay the individual and re-establish it's "sexual assault programs and policies" as a whole.

Midgal encourages female students whom have been sexually assaulted to use a Title IX complaint as a way to insist more active sexual assault awareness programs from colleges and to put an end to sexual assault crimes which take place on many college campuses. In response to Midgal's article, I feel that as a woman, it crucial for women to actively take a stand against sexual assault crimes. It is appalling to me how universities such as Arizona State University, respond to assault crimes and their obvious indifference to the safety and well-being of their students. Like Midgal, I feel that women should use a Title IX complaint, as a way to have universities re-evaluate their sexual program and policies as a whole!

You too can take an active stand against sexual violence! Programs such as Students Active for Ending Rape(SAFER) strive to inform individuals on ways to put an end to assault crimes on campus and ways to get actively involved in programs that SAFER has to offer!! Trust me, it's worth the read!

May the Force Be With You!

Lauren

NYPD Patrol Cars Go Green!

The Inhabitat is always finding new ways to promote a green lifestyle that is maintainable for it's readers. Recently, The Inhabitat reports on New York City's newest effort to promote a greener city. On February 24, 2009, The New York City Police Department reportedly plans to purchase 40 2009 Nissan Altima Hybrids which shall be used during police patrols. These hybrids shall run on 35 miles per gallon. Compared to NYPD'S older model The Dodge Charger, this switch to a more fuel and energy efficient car will be more beneficial to the environment and health of New York City.

New York City plans to invest in a total of 1.1 million dollars for this switch to a more energy efficient vehicle. The department plans to purchase 18 of these vehicles for patrol usage. These cars shall have a top speed of 113 mph which is better when compared to the 165 mph speed of the Dodge Charger. Not to mention the fact these cars will be more technologically advanced due to the fact that each of these cars shall obtain a pre built-in-laptop for their usage. So the next time your in the Big Apple, you might see one of these cars patrolling the streets.

Welcome!

Hello! My name is Lauren Leiva. I am currently enrolled in Ramapo College looking to pursue an education in Political Science! Thanks for clicking and visiting my post! Enjoy your visit and have fun!

May the force be with you!
Lauren